Another Bad Deal, Another Unelected Negotiator

 


A Prophecy of the Negotiation Table

I write this as a man who is tired of watching the same pattern repeat.

Jared Kushner has once again inserted himself into a negotiation with Vladimir Putin.

No one voted for him.

He holds no elected office that the public can remove him from.

And yet he keeps showing up in rooms that decide whether nations keep bleeding or stop.

Steve Witkoff is with him this time.

They landed in Moscow on September 5. Putin met them. A short pause in strikes was arranged so they could travel onward to Kyiv. The headlines call it peace work.

I call it another round of the same play.

And I am writing what follows as a warning—a prophecy in the sense of a foretelling based upon a pattern I believe I see repeating, not as a claim that I have been given some private revelation from God.

Because sometimes prophecy is nothing more complicated than looking at the road ahead and warning people about the cliff.

“The prudent man foreseeth the evil, and hideth himself: but the simple pass on, and are punished.”

Proverbs 22:3 KJV

Putin has seen this type before.

He is older in the game.

He does not need a lecture from a man whose principal qualification, in the eyes of many critics, is family connection and access.

If anyone thinks they can run the same pressure play that failed to produce an agreement in Pakistan in April and get a different result with Russia, they may be kidding themselves.


What Happened in Pakistan

On April 10 and 11, 2026, the United States sat down with Iran in Islamabad.

High-level people flew in.

Vice President Vance.

Kushner.

Witkoff.

Iran sent its own heavy hitters.

Pakistan hosted.

The talks were aimed at addressing a temporary ceasefire and other major disputes, including the Strait of Hormuz and sanctions. Expectations were low going in, and the positions of the two sides remained far apart.

After long hours, they left without the settlement that Washington had hoped to achieve.

That is the record.

Not rumor.

Talks. No final agreement. Then everyone went home.

Now the same circle is trying Russia.

Same style.

Same unelected faces at the table.

Same belief that this time the negotiators can somehow make the impossible possible because they are supposedly “great negotiators.”

But Russia is not Iran.

And Putin is not walking into the room blind.


The Problem Is Not Just the Deal

The problem is also who is making the deal.

A negotiator who represents the United States should be above reproach.

That means there should be no reasonable question that the negotiator could personally financially gain from information obtained inside those meetings.

He should not be sitting in a room discussing territory, sanctions, energy, reconstruction, or markets while simultaneously having private financial interests that could potentially be affected by the outcome.

He should not appear to be a man placing bets on the very ground he is pretending to settle.

I do not have bank records in my hand.

I am not a prosecutor.

And I am not claiming as established fact that Jared Kushner is illegally trading on inside information.

I am a citizen watching the same names appear in the same conflicts while questions about private financial interests continue to follow the people involved.

That distinction matters.

But so does appearance.

Reuters has reported that Kushner and Witkoff have been central figures in the Trump administration's unconventional diplomatic efforts, including the current Russia-Ukraine negotiations. Reuters has also reported criticism from experienced diplomats regarding the administration's reliance on informal networks and nontraditional envoys.

If people inside or outside Iran question whether negotiations are being influenced by financial considerations, those questions should be answered with transparency rather than simply dismissed.

Denial may answer an accusation.

It does not always answer the appearance of a conflict.

I am tired of unelected people who hold ties to our government and to powerful private interests, then walk into negotiations that move money, land, energy, and lives.

Insider advantage does not have to be proven in court before the public is entitled to ask questions.

When the same people keep showing up, and the deals keep failing or bending in ways that appear to benefit people close to the table, trust dies.

A man who was never elected should not become the unquestioned face of American leverage.

If a negotiator personally profits from the information or circumstances created by the negotiations, that would be a serious conflict.

That is why the standard should be higher than merely asking:

“Is it technically legal?”

The question should be:

“Is it clean?”

Because if the country pays while someone close to the table profits, that is not diplomacy.

That is a side business wearing a flag.


Putin Is Not Iran

Iran could be squeezed, delayed, threatened, sanctioned, and talked past.

Russia is not that.

Putin has watched Western envoys come and go for years.

He knows when a proposal is serious.

He knows when it is theater.

He knows when the people across the table have interests beyond the war itself.

And he knows patience.

That is why I believe there is danger in assuming that Russia can simply be pressured into accepting whatever proposal is placed before it.

The current talks themselves demonstrate how wide the gap remains. Reuters reports that Putin described the situation in Ukraine as difficult, while Russia continues to demand major territorial and strategic concessions from Ukraine. At the same time, attacks continue and the fundamental disagreements remain unresolved.

Thinking you can roll Russia the way some people thought they could roll Tehran is how you get bitten.

Not necessarily tomorrow.

Not necessarily with a missile.

Sometimes nations bite through economics.

Sometimes through energy.

Sometimes through military pressure.

Sometimes through alliances.

Sometimes through something nobody saw coming because everybody was too busy celebrating the press conference.

And this is where my prophecy begins:

Watch the next few days.

Watch the next few weeks.

When the pause ends, watch what happens.

Watch whether the terms on paper match the terms on the ground.

Watch what is offered.

Watch what is refused.

Watch who suddenly changes their language.

Watch who begins blaming the other side.

Watch who talks about “peace” while positions harden.

This will not necessarily be clean.

And I do not believe it will be as simple as the press releases make it appear.


What a Clean Table Would Look Like

A real negotiator should have no financial interest in the same region he is negotiating over.

He should have no undisclosed financial relationship with the same governments or entities whose interests he is supposed to mediate.

He should disclose enough of his financial interests that the public can reasonably determine whether he has something to gain or lose from the outcome.

He should be accountable.

He should be transparent.

And when possible, he should be subject to meaningful public oversight.

I am not on Putin's team.

I am not on anyone else's team.

I am on the side of a simple rule:

The people who sit in those rooms should not get richer because the rooms exist.

The Bible gives us a principle that reaches far beyond ancient commerce:

“A false balance is abomination to the LORD: but a just weight is his delight.”

Proverbs 11:1 KJV

That verse is not merely about scales in a marketplace.

It is about honesty.

It is about fairness.

It is about whether the weight is secretly being altered while everyone is told the scale is level.

When the scale is tipped toward the man who already has the connections, the nation pays the difference.


The Prophecy Is Simple

I am not claiming to know the exact event that will happen next.

I am not saying, “Thus saith the Lord,” when the Lord has not spoken those words through me.

But I can look at a pattern.

And I can warn.

The Bible says:

“Where no counsel is, the people fall: but in the multitude of counsellors there is safety.”

Proverbs 11:14 KJV

So watch the counsel.

Watch the people giving it.

Watch the interests behind it.

Watch the money.

Watch the markets.

Watch the military movements.

Watch the language coming from Moscow, Washington, and Kyiv.

And watch what happens after the negotiators leave the room.

Because the greatest danger may not be what is said during the meeting.

It may be what happens when the meeting is over.

A failed negotiation can produce another negotiation.

A bad agreement can produce another war.

A secret concession can produce consequences years later.

And a deal made for the wrong reasons can become a burden carried by people who never had a seat at the table.

So keep your eyes open.

I believe we are watching another chapter unfold.

And my warning is this:

Do not believe every announcement of peace simply because the word peace is printed across the headline.

“For when they shall say, Peace and safety; then sudden destruction cometh upon them...”

1 Thessalonians 5:3 KJV

I am not predicting fire from heaven.

I am not claiming to know the exact hour.

I am saying that failed negotiations between powerful nations can leave wreckage behind.

And when the same patterns keep repeating, eventually somebody pays the price.

Watch Russia.

Watch America.

Watch Ukraine.

Watch the negotiators.

Watch the money.

And above all—

watch what happens when the table is cleared and the men walk away.

Because sometimes the prophecy is not in what they tell you.

Sometimes the prophecy is in what happens next.

Comments

Popular Posts